|
FEELING
WITH THE EYE
A remarkable change took place in the human condition with the rise of
Euclidian space, three-dimensional perspective, and, above all, the phonetic
alphabet. Each of these inventions favored the eye at the expense of all
other senses. The value accorded the eye destroyed the harmonic orchestration
of the senses & led to an emphasis upon the individual experience
of the individual sense, especially the sense of sight. Where other senses
were employed, it was with the bias of the eye. The
eye is like no other sense. When used in isolation, it perceives a flat,
continuous world without intervals. Yet it also favors only one thing
at a time: it focuses on a particular & abstracts it from a
total situation. To connect these fragments, literate man built mental
bridges. He spoke of a "row of trees" or a "circle of stones,"
when neither row nor circle existed except in his mind & language.
He favored the "story-line" & arranged his thoughts "seriously,"
that is, serially. From this came the scanning eye of the reader &
much else besides: lineality, causality, temporality, ultimately much
of what we call Western civilization. Western
man not only emphasized sight, but a special kind of sight, "pure
sight," divorced from all other senses. "At first sight"
the world looks flat, as if it were no more than meaningless patches of
light & color jumbled into a quiltwork. Infants born without arms
or legs can never see in depth. Depth is discovered by touch, then married
to sight. The eye caresses over objects. Tactility
converts the flat world of sight into the three-dimensional world of bodies.
One by one, objects grow out of this chaotic world and remain unmistakably
separate when identified. Patients, blind from birth, on whom vision has
been bestowed by an operation, at first shrink from the welter of additional
stimulation & from the flat continuity of the world they see. In 1964,
in Sicily, five brothers - all blind from birth - each acquired sight
following an operation. Months later, they were photographed holding on
to one another, with downcast eyes, as the lead brother felt his
way through the doorway of their home. It took time & effort before
they once more recognized the objects around them as separate items. The
world of the blind is a world of three-dimensional bodies existing in
emptiness. Test this yourself: move about the room with eyes closed -
suddenly, without warning, you will bump into some object. Emptiness combines
with sudden interface. All encounters become abrupt. "To the blind,
all things are sudden." Without sight, connections are lacking: all
the gradations, shadings, & continuities of the visual world are gone.
Artists
visually convey the sense of touch in a variety of ways. Renoir
painted a woman's body as the hand feels it, not as the eye sees it. Leonardo's
multiline sketches of women & children also belong to the hand, not
the eye. In
the same sense, artists create hard-edge art, that is, abrupt edges
with intervals. When Gertrude Stein met Picasso in Paris, around 1905,
he asked her to obtain American comic strips for him. He was studying
Japanese prints at the time, but found in comic strips clearer examples
of interface & interval which interested him so much. It was at this
time he began the study of African tribal art. Most
tribal art is hard-edge art. So is children's art. A Vancouver filmmaker
provided young children with the means to make animated films. The result
was nearly 200 films of WHAM! BANG! with figures appearing, disappearing.
There were no characters in the ordinary sense: no shadings, no gradations,
just abrupt encounters a la Batman of hard-edge, cartoon art. Hard-edge
art is a visual presentation, but the experience it evokes or conveys
isn't visual; it's tactile. It's full of abrupt encounters - sudden interfaces,
then emptiness. When
you have interface & emptiness, you have happenings. In the world
of happenings, surfaces & events collide & grind against each
other, creating new forms, much as the action of dialogue creates new
insights. It's the world of all-at-onceness where things hit each other
but where there are no connections. Not
only artists & writers, but also composers use this combination of
hard-edge & interval to convey the experience of touch. Edgard Varese
writes: "Electronics has given music a new dimension and a new freedom.
My music is based on the movement of unrelated sound masses which I always
conceived as moving simultaneously at different speeds, and I looked forward
to the time when science would provide the means of realization. Now,
thanks to electronics, such unrelated metrical simultaneity is at last
possible." Much
contemporary music favors interface & interval, in contrast to the
acoustic continuity of symphonic music. These techniques are basic to
the poetry of Pound & Eliot, as they were for the Symbolists. Above
all, Joyce took over the art of the interval. He
used interval & interface as a means of retrieving that fantastic
wealth of perception & experience stored in ordinary language. Dispensing
with the storyline became a means of instant grasp of complex wholes.
The scanning eye is offended by both intervals & abrupt encounters. It favors continuity. It builds bridges in the mind to create a smooth, uninterrupted flow from word to word, thought to thought. Joyce dynamited that freeway, leaving gaping intervals & massive roadblocks. Suddenly it was no longer possible to skim the page: the reader fell between words, struggled over others, and soon he was swarming all over them, experiencing them in new ways, going right inside them, deciphering riddles, discovering hidden dimensions, releasing imprisoned energies. |
|
Pages
24-27
Oh, What a Blow That Phantom Gave Me! by Edmund Carpenter Holt, Rinehart and Winston - New York, Chicago, San Francisco Copyright 1972, 1973 by Edmund Carpenter |
||
|
Translated
to hypermedia and edited by Michael Wesch
2002
|